Posts
Harvard University, once a towering beacon of intellectual rigor, now stands trembling at the edge of a self-inflicted abyss, its prestige unraveling like a cheap suit in a storm, or falling away like toilet paper on a shoe.
U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, a figure whose steely resolve could make even the most sanctimonious progressive squirm, has laid down the gauntlet with devastating precision: “Harvard’s failure to protect students on campus from anti-Semitic discrimination—all while promoting divisive ideologies over free inquiry—has put its reputation in serious jeopardy.”
And so it has.
The Trump administration, never one to mince words or dawdle in the face of moral rot, declared on a crisp Monday that it would launch a “comprehensive review” of the $9 billion in federal grants and contracts propping up this faltering Ivy League titan—all because Harvard couldn’t muster the spine to shield its Jewish students from a rising tide of bigotry.
The machinery of accountability is already in motion. A joint task force—comprising the Departments of Education and Health and Human Services, alongside the U.S. General Services Administration—has pledged to dissect “more than $255.6 million in contracts between Harvard University, its affiliates and the federal government,” not to mention “more than $8.7 billion in multi-year grant commitments.” These are numbers so astronomical they could fund a small nation, yet they’ve been squandered on an institution that seems more enamored with ideological posturing than safeguarding its own.
McMahon, with a clarity that cuts through the fog of academic self-delusion, reflected on Harvard’s legacy: “Harvard has served as a symbol of the American dream for generations—the pinnacle aspiration for students all over the world to work hard and earn admission to the storied institution.” But then came the hammer blow: “Harvard’s failure to protect students on campus from anti-Semitic discrimination—all while promoting divisive ideologies over free inquiry—has put its reputation in serious jeopardy.”
Yet, ever the pragmatist, she offered a lifeline: “Harvard can right these wrongs and restore itself to a campus dedicated to academic excellence and truth-seeking, where all students feel safe on its campus.” A noble sentiment, though one wonders if Harvard’s leadership—steeped in the pieties of the age—has the stomach for such a return to first principles.
The U.S. agencies are not playing games. They’ve signaled they could slap stop-work orders on Harvard’s contracts or, if the university’s noncompliance with federal rules is laid bare, sever the financial umbilical cord entirely. Josh Gruenbaum, commissioner of the Federal Acquisition Service, put it with a firmness that brooks no dissent: “This administration has proven that we will take swift action to hold institutions accountable if they allow antisemitism to fester. We will not hesitate to act if Harvard fails to do so.” Here is a rare instance of government speaking plainly, without the usual varnish of equivocation.
So Harvard stands at a precipice, its fate dangling like a condemned man awaiting the noose. Will it summon the courage to confront its failures, or will it sink further into the morass of cowardice and conformity? The answer lies not in the stars, but in the choices of those who roam its ivy-clad corridors—choices that, for now, seem woefully out of reach.
Yet, ever the pragmatist, she offered a lifeline: “Harvard can right these wrongs and restore itself to a campus dedicated to academic excellence and truth-seeking, where all students feel safe on its campus.” A noble sentiment, though one wonders if Harvard’s leadership—steeped in the pieties of the age—has the stomach for such a return to first principles.
Meanwhile, the announcement pointed to Columbia University, where a similar federal reckoning forced a list of nine Trump administration demands, including a ban on masked protests—an absurdity that should never have needed banning. Columbia’s interim president, caught in the crosshairs of this mess, fled the scene on a Friday, perhaps retreating to ponder the wreckage over a consolatory cup of latte.
The U.S. agencies are not playing games. They’ve signaled they could slap stop-work orders on Harvard’s contracts or, if the university’s noncompliance with federal rules is laid bare, sever the financial umbilical cord entirely. Josh Gruenbaum, commissioner of the Federal Acquisition Service, put it with a firmness that brooks no dissent: “This administration has proven that we will take swift action to hold institutions accountable if they allow antisemitism to fester. We will not hesitate to act if Harvard fails to do so.” Here is a rare instance of government speaking plainly, without the usual varnish of equivocation.
So Harvard stands at a precipice, its fate dangling like a condemned man awaiting the noose. Will it summon the courage to confront its failures, or will it sink further into the morass of cowardice and conformity? The answer lies not in the stars, but in the choices of those who roam its ivy-clad corridors—choices that, for now, seem woefully out of reach.
Especially out of reach for the moral cowards.
Tweet
"Hey, if you’re enjoying this blog as much as I enjoy writing it, feel free to fuel my caffeine addiction over at Buy Me a Coffee – no pressure, just good vibes!"
No comments:
Post a Comment