Some women threaten sex strike over Roe v. Wade decision--it's a good thing

One of the leaders of the sex strike

Women who approve of killing inconvenient unborn babies are threatening to go on a sex strike after SCOTUS overturned the Roe v. Wade ruling, which gave the federal government jurisdiction over abortion. That jurisdiction has now been returned to the states where it belongs, so democracy wins.

But a sex strike?

That's a wonderful idea and for once, pro-life Americans completely agree with their pro-death counterparts. Let them practice abstinence and stop sleeping with random people and in the long run everybody wins. 

Social media went ballistic over the sex strike threats:

"Sex Strike starting immediately. No sex with cis straight conservative men. No sex with men who aren't supporting our rights and fighting for this to be fixed. No sex until Roe vs. Wade is viewed as a constitutional right."

I was told that "cis" means straight so "cis straight" is redundant. And the probability that a true, conservative man would have sex with a pro-abortion woman is slim, if he's aware of her ideology. But there are, of course, men who would have sex with a watermelon if it sat out in the sun long enough.

"I live in New York and I am DOUBLE FURIOUS with the Supreme Court . I want to find people who are coordinating a mass sex strike . That is our power."

I was born and grew up in New York, and I am DOUBLE HAPPY with the Supreme Court decision to give back power to the states. If this woman has trouble finding people willing to coordinate a mass sex strike, she's not looking in the right places.

Another woman tweeted:

"I've had the urge to scream at the top of my lungs all day today.. and if you don’t know or understand why.. you’re probably part of the problem. I say we go on a sex strike."

I say you go on a sex strike too. Fewer dead babies, fewer leftists being born.

The truth is, these women [and men who think they're women] don't generally know that the end of Roe will not spell the end of unborn baby murder. For the trillionth time, it merely stops being a federal law, it becomes under the states' purview. 

She's abstaining until Roe v. Wade is codified

The next posting is from an obviously angry, vulgar woman who thinks she is somehow being spiteful to men, employers, merchants and men they live with who are too lazy to clean up after themselves. She is not going to buy anything in stores she magically knows the owner's stance on abortion. This woman is an idiot who views sex as something she does to men rather than an expression of love and oneness. It's good that she's abstaining:

"Sex strike. Work strike. Spending strike. We’re not going to f*** you. We’re not doing your menial less-paid jobs. We’re not cleaning up your s**t. We’re not buying ANYTHING in your stores. You want to flex on women? Okay motherf**kers."

Finally, there's a woman who says unmarried women should go on a sex strike, which is kind of a religious idea, if you think about it. 

"In protest of the overturning of Roe V Wade every unmarried woman should go on a sex strike, stand up for what you believe in."

* * *

 Consider subscribing to Brain Flushings and please check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against Communism, ignorance, The New York Times, and the heebie-jeebies.

* * *

It's about time unmarried women might choose to wait until after marriage to begin a sexual relationship. I know this would come as a terrible price for many men to face, but it would drastically reduce the number of babies killed in the womb and increase the number of babies born into intact families.

So go ahead, ladies, make my day.

Tweet