Posts
White House publicist Jen Psaki refused to honestly deal with questions she was asked about how she dismissed her own comments that Hunter Biden's laptop in 2020 were part of a "Russian disinformation" campaign against his father, now-PINO Joe Biden.
When asked about the comments she made, she changed the subject: "I’d point you to the Department of Justice and also to Hunter Biden’s representatives," Psaki told a reporter Wednesday, taking the focus away from herself so as to avoid looking like a lying sack of ginger.
The White House previously dismissed the contents of the scuzzy laptop that was originally published by the New York Post in October of 2020, resulting in the Post being banned from Twitter and Facebook but miraculously confirmed by the New York Times in paragraph 24 of an article on Wednesday. The article wasn't intended to do anything more than make Hunter look good as the article focused on his paying off of his tax debt, not the veracity of the laptop from hell story.
In the same press conference, Psaki was again asked about the subject and specifically about her comments that the laptop story was "Russian disinformation."
"Again, I'd point to the Department of Justice and Hunter Biden's representatives," Psaki said. "I'm a spokesperson for the United States. He doesn't work for the United States."
Except she spoke about the laptop back then, even when Hunter was not working for the US. Why didn't the press push back on that tidbit?
Well, perhaps they pushed the lie because they knew it would spell trubble for Joe Biden [which is how he spells trouble]. A poll conducted soon after the 2020 election showed that 17% of Biden voters would not have voted for him if they had known about the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop when they cast their votes. That would have swung the election to the evil orange man.
The New York Post and anyone reposting what they had written was banned from Twitter for spreading the truth. But even now, the former newspaper The New York Times, buried the lede all the way down into the dregs of the article.
* * *
Sex. Now that I have your attention: for more hard-hitting content, and a few soft-hitting ones too, subscribe to Brain Flushings and check out the ads on these pages. It costs nothing to subscribe and it's worth every penny. And remember, every time you click on an ad, you help in the fight against John Kerry's global warming, the heebie-jeebies and the dreaded omicron.
* * *
The Times' article tried to make it seem as though we are just now finding out about the scuzzy computer when all along, we knew.
But they knew, Joe knew, Psaki knew, and sure as hell, Hunter knew.
No comments:
Post a Comment