British Prime Minister Theresa May spoke in Philadelphia about "the peaceful religion of Islam" and "internationalism."
To her discredit, May banned Robert Spencer, a expert on Islam and its dangers to the Western world, from the country, likening him to a violent terrorist for correctly saying that "[Islam] is a religion and is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers. . . "
But she did not ban the steady influx of jihad preachers into the country.
For example, Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri is a preacher of hatred and jihad violence. He was banned from preaching in Pakistan because of his level of violence but the UK Home Office welcomed him with open arms.
More recently, the UK Home Office admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar, a Muslim who said "If there's homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One--the easiest one maybe--chop their head off, that's the easiest. Second--burn them to death. Third--throw them off a cliff. Fourth--tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth--a combination of the above."
The guy's a real sweetheart if you're straight, though.
These are just two examples of how Theresa May and the UK has allowed themselves to come under siege by Islamic extremists. The UK government recently admitted two jihad preachers who praised the murderer of a person who was opposed to Pakistan's blasphemy laws. One of these scumbuns was praised by none other than the Archbishop of Canterbury while the country banned three bishops from Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted.
What's wrong with this picture?
Does May think that by giving in to jihad extremists and admitting them, while banning those who oppose jihad terror, she will pacify her uncontrollable and booming Muslim population?
Is she crazy enough to believe that if she rids her country of "Islamophobia" that Muslims will no longer respond to their jihad imperative?
It's obvious that Brexit has been discarded by May. Briton needs to vote her out of office and elect a Prime Minister who will make Britain what it used to be.
Tweet
To her discredit, May banned Robert Spencer, a expert on Islam and its dangers to the Western world, from the country, likening him to a violent terrorist for correctly saying that "[Islam] is a religion and is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers. . . "
But she did not ban the steady influx of jihad preachers into the country.
For example, Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri is a preacher of hatred and jihad violence. He was banned from preaching in Pakistan because of his level of violence but the UK Home Office welcomed him with open arms.
More recently, the UK Home Office admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar, a Muslim who said "If there's homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One--the easiest one maybe--chop their head off, that's the easiest. Second--burn them to death. Third--throw them off a cliff. Fourth--tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth--a combination of the above."
The guy's a real sweetheart if you're straight, though.
These are just two examples of how Theresa May and the UK has allowed themselves to come under siege by Islamic extremists. The UK government recently admitted two jihad preachers who praised the murderer of a person who was opposed to Pakistan's blasphemy laws. One of these scumbuns was praised by none other than the Archbishop of Canterbury while the country banned three bishops from Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted.
What's wrong with this picture?
Does May think that by giving in to jihad extremists and admitting them, while banning those who oppose jihad terror, she will pacify her uncontrollable and booming Muslim population?
Is she crazy enough to believe that if she rids her country of "Islamophobia" that Muslims will no longer respond to their jihad imperative?
It's obvious that Brexit has been discarded by May. Briton needs to vote her out of office and elect a Prime Minister who will make Britain what it used to be.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment