I'm not going to pretend I watch CNBC or any of the NBC affiliates. As far as I'm concerned, NBC stands for Not Being Credible or National Bull Chippers, and MSNBC stands for Matthews Speaks Nothing But Crap. I've had it with leftist media, and while I want to keep an open mind on both sides of the political spectrum, I find it intolerable to listen to the garbage the left spews pretending it's newsworthy.
I am not going to pretend that I know the names of the libtards who questioned the GOP candidates in the debate. The woman, who I've seen before as I heard her smear the GOP candidates, I will refer to as Clay Lips. She seemed to delight in attacking the answers to the questions she asked before they were completely formed by Cain, Gingrich, and Romney, and I believe she had an orgasm, (much like Biden did when Solyndra was first mentioned in his office), when Perry screwed up his answer by forgetting the third program he would cut if he were King of the Forest--I think all of America's conservatives felt sorry for him, but those of us who know about his sympathies with Islam and sharia law, felt relieved.
Rick Santini, I believe his name is, was an utter moron with his tone and the framing of his questions, and he couldn't hide his hatred for the right when he challenged their answers. I thought a debate was supposed to be between the candidates, not between the people asking the questions and the candidate trying to answer them. I wish Republicans would stand together to boycott the overtly liberal-socialist media, but that would probably be impossible from a practical standpoint as they all feel they need as much exposure as possible. (Why does the word 'exposure' always remind me of Democrats like Weiner, Clinton, and JFK?)
But Clay Lips, Santini, and the Sphincter Brothers aside, I think we can see who came out on top in this debate. If you said Perry, you weren't watching--his brain fart, I believe, caused him the nomination. But if you said Romney or Cain, I think you're on the right track. Cain handled the questioning of the sexual harassment allegations extremely well and, as always, is personable and likeable. I think his reference to Nancy Pelosi as "Princess Nancy" was a big mistake because it was petty and may have taken away some of his likability score. Romney seems presidential and really is a job creator, whether you agree with that or not. I concur with Dick Morris that Romney actually is a conservative and his Massachusetts politics was his way of getting elected. I may be wrong, but I'm the last to admit it, with the exception of Obama.
I believe that Gingrich, as always, did well, but he was a bit pedantic and somewhat pissy, and this will not score points with independent voters. He comes off too professorial but he is glib and knowledgeable, with tons of political experience and success behind him. But then there's that little issue of scandals to deal with--this is his thorn.
I think Bachmann was fine, but she's like that longshot I bet on a few years ago at Belmont Park--still running for the clubhouse turn at the stretch with a lot of track out in front. The left wing media also portrays Bachmann as an insane flake, which is disgusting of them to do, but certainly not out of character. The one thing you have to say about Michele Bachmann is that she is consistent in her beliefs, and is very good with dealing with numbers involving the economy.
Rick Santorum always looks like he is about to cry or soil his pants, and Ron Paul looks like he should be holding a rectal thermometer and preparing to use it on you. (Rectal thermometers, by the way, remind me of Al Gore, who, I always think of as "earth's rectal thermometer.') John Huntsman seems like the kind of guy who always had his lunch money taken from him by some big kid named Jimbo. His numbers suck like a black hole but he's fun to listen to because he acts like he knows everything and even speaks Mandarin or whatever.
I can't believe that there's less than a year for the election. Time seems to fly under socialism, cronyism, and Eric Holder's lies. The thing that worries me is that Obama has tons of money and the average IQ is 100.
Tweet
I am not going to pretend that I know the names of the libtards who questioned the GOP candidates in the debate. The woman, who I've seen before as I heard her smear the GOP candidates, I will refer to as Clay Lips. She seemed to delight in attacking the answers to the questions she asked before they were completely formed by Cain, Gingrich, and Romney, and I believe she had an orgasm, (much like Biden did when Solyndra was first mentioned in his office), when Perry screwed up his answer by forgetting the third program he would cut if he were King of the Forest--I think all of America's conservatives felt sorry for him, but those of us who know about his sympathies with Islam and sharia law, felt relieved.
Rick Santini, I believe his name is, was an utter moron with his tone and the framing of his questions, and he couldn't hide his hatred for the right when he challenged their answers. I thought a debate was supposed to be between the candidates, not between the people asking the questions and the candidate trying to answer them. I wish Republicans would stand together to boycott the overtly liberal-socialist media, but that would probably be impossible from a practical standpoint as they all feel they need as much exposure as possible. (Why does the word 'exposure' always remind me of Democrats like Weiner, Clinton, and JFK?)
But Clay Lips, Santini, and the Sphincter Brothers aside, I think we can see who came out on top in this debate. If you said Perry, you weren't watching--his brain fart, I believe, caused him the nomination. But if you said Romney or Cain, I think you're on the right track. Cain handled the questioning of the sexual harassment allegations extremely well and, as always, is personable and likeable. I think his reference to Nancy Pelosi as "Princess Nancy" was a big mistake because it was petty and may have taken away some of his likability score. Romney seems presidential and really is a job creator, whether you agree with that or not. I concur with Dick Morris that Romney actually is a conservative and his Massachusetts politics was his way of getting elected. I may be wrong, but I'm the last to admit it, with the exception of Obama.
I believe that Gingrich, as always, did well, but he was a bit pedantic and somewhat pissy, and this will not score points with independent voters. He comes off too professorial but he is glib and knowledgeable, with tons of political experience and success behind him. But then there's that little issue of scandals to deal with--this is his thorn.
I think Bachmann was fine, but she's like that longshot I bet on a few years ago at Belmont Park--still running for the clubhouse turn at the stretch with a lot of track out in front. The left wing media also portrays Bachmann as an insane flake, which is disgusting of them to do, but certainly not out of character. The one thing you have to say about Michele Bachmann is that she is consistent in her beliefs, and is very good with dealing with numbers involving the economy.
Santorum about to do something |
I can't believe that there's less than a year for the election. Time seems to fly under socialism, cronyism, and Eric Holder's lies. The thing that worries me is that Obama has tons of money and the average IQ is 100.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment