Posts
I always feel sad on 9-11; I worked with families who lost loved ones and worked with victims who lost a piece of their lives. Unlike many people, I do not see 9-11 as a day of reflection, a day of understanding and forgiveness, a day of trying to comprehend why this happened to us--I'm just not built that way.
No, I see 9-11 as a day of remembering who did this to us. I see it as a day of commitment and a solemn promise to never allow this to happen again by spreading the word and enlightening others about who our enemies are, and not caring about b.s. political correctness.
Some people actually blame the United States for what happened on that sunny Tuesday, ten years ago. These are the same people who would, if captured by an enemy, give their captors information about fellow prisoners, just to curry favors and be spared. I find Paul "I sleep with a nightlight" Krugman to fit this category of slimeball coward and traitor. I also find him to be a crummy economist, Nobel Prize aside, and an even worse writer.
Krugman, a columnist for the New York Times (you know, the anti-American socialist rag), went on his predictable anti-patriotic rant on the 10th anniversary of 9-11 in which he labeled G.W. Bush, Rudy Giuliani, and Bernie Kerik as "fake heroes." He stated on his "Conscience of a Liberal" blog: "What happened after 9/11--and I think even people on the right know this, whether they admit it or not--was deeply shameful. Fake heroes like Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and yes, George W. Bush raced to cash in on the horror. And then the attack was used to justify an unrelated war the neocons wanted to fight, for all the wrong reasons."
Of course if GW Bush, Rudy Giuliani, and Bernie Kerik did not go to the scene of the mass murder, committed in the name of Islam, Krugman would be calling them cowards, saying they failed to do what was expected of them. This is the tactic liberals like Paul Robin Krugman use against conservatives--Krugman is like a woman whose man is never right about anything. I imagine he pees sitting down while reading "Town and Country." I can see him in high school as a pimply-faced kid who always had his lunch money taken away and who went and told the teacher on the girl that took it.
So why did Krugman write such repugnant crap in his blog? It seems to me, he was using 9-11 as a platform to advance his hatred of anyone better than him, anyone with real courage, and the guts to make decisions that might be wrong, but that had to be made.The only people who never make mistakes are those who don't do anything to make them. People like Krugman, for example.
If you disagree with what I've said here, you just might be a liberal.
Tweet
No, I see 9-11 as a day of remembering who did this to us. I see it as a day of commitment and a solemn promise to never allow this to happen again by spreading the word and enlightening others about who our enemies are, and not caring about b.s. political correctness.
 |
| Ties his tie like in junior high |
Krugman, a columnist for the New York Times (you know, the anti-American socialist rag), went on his predictable anti-patriotic rant on the 10th anniversary of 9-11 in which he labeled G.W. Bush, Rudy Giuliani, and Bernie Kerik as "fake heroes." He stated on his "Conscience of a Liberal" blog: "What happened after 9/11--and I think even people on the right know this, whether they admit it or not--was deeply shameful. Fake heroes like Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and yes, George W. Bush raced to cash in on the horror. And then the attack was used to justify an unrelated war the neocons wanted to fight, for all the wrong reasons."
Of course if GW Bush, Rudy Giuliani, and Bernie Kerik did not go to the scene of the mass murder, committed in the name of Islam, Krugman would be calling them cowards, saying they failed to do what was expected of them. This is the tactic liberals like Paul Robin Krugman use against conservatives--Krugman is like a woman whose man is never right about anything. I imagine he pees sitting down while reading "Town and Country." I can see him in high school as a pimply-faced kid who always had his lunch money taken away and who went and told the teacher on the girl that took it.
If you disagree with what I've said here, you just might be a liberal.
If you are interested in terrorism and suspense, I have provided 2 links (below) for a hard copy (soft cover) edition and an eBook edition of my latest novel, Jihad Joe. It's a story about Zed Nill, a New York based reporter, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists. He must escape, or be beheaded the following day . . . the clock is ticking.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment